Current:Home > MarketsPrince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K. -RiskRadar
Prince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K.
View
Date:2025-04-14 08:26:44
Prince Harry is facing a royal setback in his quest for protection.
London's High Court has ruled against the Duke of Sussex on May 23 over his attempt to pay for his own security when he's in the U.K.
After he and wife Meghan Markle stepped back from their royal duties amid their move to America in 2020, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex lost access to police security that usually accompanies royal members. Now, according to Reuters, the High Court in London has ruled his lawyers could not move forward with a judicial review that would explore whether he could pay for the protective agents himself.
The decision to take away publicly-funded security was made by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures, also known as RAVEC. And according to the BBC, Judge Martin Chamberlain said in his ruling said that RAVEC was not incorrect in their decision that allowing payment for protection would be against public interest.
E! News has reached out to Harry's reps for comment and have not heard back.
The ruling comes less than one week after Harry, Meghan and her mom Doria Ragland were involved in a "near catastrophic car chase" with "highly aggressive paparazzi," per the couple's rep, after attending a gala in NYC on May 16.
After the incident, authorities also addressed the situation, telling E! News in a statement, "There were numerous photographers that made their transport challenging. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex arrived at their destination and there were no reported collisions, summonses, injuries, or arrests in regard."
Get the latest tea from inside the palace walls. Sign up for Royal Recap!veryGood! (1428)
Related
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- How non-shooting deaths involving police slip through the cracks in Las Vegas
- Home Depot buying supplier to professional contractors in a deal valued at about $18.25B
- Score 60% off Lounge Underwear and Bras, $234 Worth of Clinique Makeup for $52, and More Deals
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- Authorizing sports betting in Georgia may lack needed votes from lawmakers
- Women's Sweet 16: Reseeding has South Carolina still No. 1, but UConn is closing in
- Women's Sweet 16 bold predictions for Friday games: Notre Dame, Stanford see dance end
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- I Tried 83 Beauty Products This Month. These 15 Are Worth Your Money: Milk Makeup, Glossier, and More
Ranking
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- For-profit school accused of preying on Black students reaches $28.5 million settlement
- Democrat who campaigned on reproductive rights wins special election for Alabama state House seat
- The colonel is getting saucy: KFC announces Saucy Nuggets, newest addition to menu
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Ex-New Mexico lawmaker facing more federal charges, accused of diverting money meant for schools
- How do you move a massive ship and broken bridge? It could keep Baltimore port closed for weeks
- Judge forges ahead with pretrial motions in Georgia election interference case
Recommendation
What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
Harmony Montgomery case spurs bill to require defendants’ appearance in court
Applications for US unemployment benefits dip to 210,000 in strong job market
What is Good Friday? What the holy day means for Christians around the world
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
'Shirley': Who plays Shirley Chisholm and other politicians in popular new Netflix film?
Tax return extensions: Why you should (or shouldn't) do it and how to request one
2024 NFL mock draft: Four QBs go in top four picks thanks to projected trade